c
creative_tamim

Tamim Khan

@creative_tamim
4.9(25)

Designing Your Brand Signature

Bangladesh
Inglés, Hebreo, Español, Bengalí
Parte de la información aparece en idioma inglés.
Sobre mí
Modern logo designer creating clean, memorable brand identities for real estate, property, and business brands. My goal is to deliver unique, professional logos that help your brand stand out and look trustworthy.... Lee más

Habilidades

c
creative_tamim
Tamim Khan
desconectado • 

Revisa mis servicios

Diseño de logos
I will do real estate, property, and construction logo design
5.0(14)

Porfolio

25 Reseñas
4.9

(24)
(0)
(1)
(0)
(0)
Desglose de calificaciones
  • Nivel de comunicación del Freelancer
    5
  • Recomendar a un amigo
    4.9
  • Servicio según lo descrito
    4.9
1-5 de 25 reseñas
Ordenar por
Más relevante
    J

    jakedote

    GB

    Reino Unido

    5

    Really pleased with the service I received from Tamim would highly recommend him to anyone who's look for a company logo! Thanks again!

    Imagen de muestra de trabajo
    Útil?
    No
    J

    jackconroy215

    PL

    Polonia

    5

    Really friendly guy

    Útil?
    No
    J
    image-docs

    jondomerik

    US

    Estados Unidos

    5

    Creative_tamim just exceeded my expectations. He has created multiple design concepts for my logo. Every design concept was amazing and awesome. Creative_tamim is a professional Logo designer on Fiverr. I will recommend you, see not anywhere else, hire him you will be in benefits.

    Imagen de muestra de trabajo
    Útil?
    No
    O

    outoftheboxmedi

    US

    Estados Unidos

    5

    Awesome seller! Good work and quick communication.

    Imagen de muestra de trabajo
    Útil?
    No
    S

    simthepim

    DK

    Dinamarca

    3.3

    We didn't find the perfect logo for me. But there was very good communication for the whole time. I could see he tried hard and put in a good effort. Unfortunately it was not the logo I really wanted, but in the end we found a solutions that satisfied both of us.

    Útil?
    No